Biomet Cementing University

Site search:

Literature

1) Herberts P, Malchau H.
Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 2000 Apr;71(2):111-21

2) Herberts P, Malchau H.
Many years of registration have improved the quality of hip arthroplasty
>>Go to Abstract
Lakartidningen 1999 May 19;96(20):2469-73, 2475-6

3) Herberts P, Malchau H.
How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.
>>Go to Abstract
Clin Orthop 1997 Nov;(344):44-60

4) Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P.
Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part I. General health evaluation in relation to definition of failure in the Swedish National Total Hip Arthoplasty register.
>>Go to Abstract
Clin Orthop 2001 Sep;(390):163-72

5) Soderman P.
On the validity of the results from the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty register.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 2000 Dec;71(296):1-33

6) Karrholm J, Herberts P, Hultmark P, Malchau H, Nivbrant B, Thanner J.
Radiostereometry of hip prostheses. Review of methodology and clinical results.
>>Go to Abstract
Clin Orthop 1997 Nov;(344):94-110

7) Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P.
The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: clinical evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants.
>>Go to Abstract
J Arthroplasty 1999 Jun;14(4):407-13

8) Uvehammer J, Karrholm J.
Inducible displacements of cemented tibial components during weight-bearing and knee extension observations during dynamic radiostereometry related to joint positions and 2 years history of migration in 16 TKR.
>>Go to Abstract
J Orthop Res 2001 Nov;19(6):1168-77

9) Borlin N, Thien T, Karrholm J.
The precision of radiostereometric measurements. Manual vs. digital measurements.
>>Go to Abstract
J Biomech 2002 Jan;35(1):69-79

10) Hultmark P, Karrholm J, Stromberg C, Granhed H, Herberts P.
Charnley cups retained during revision of the femoral component: repeated clinical and radiographic observations of 49 cups for 7-15 years.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 2001 Oct;72(5):457-66

11) Brandsson S, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI, Karrholm J.
Kinematics after tear in the anterior cruciate ligament: dynamic bilateral radiostereometric studies in 11 patients.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 2001 Aug;72(4):372-8

12) Hostner J, Hultmark P, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Tveit M.
Impaction technique and graft treatment in revisions of the femoral component: laboratory studies and clinical validation.
>>Go to Abstract
J Arthroplasty 2001 Jan;16(1):76-82

13.Hultmark P, Karrholm J, Stromberg C, Herberts P, Mose CH, Malchau H.
Cemented first-time revisions of the femoral component: prospective 7 to 13 years’ follow-up using second-generation and third-generation technique.
>>Go to Abstract
J Arthroplasty 2000 Aug;15(5):551-61

14) Nilsson KG, Karrholm J.
RSA in the assessment of aseptic loosening.
>>Go to Abstract
J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996 Jan;78(1):1-3

15) Thanner J, Freij-Larsson C, Karrholm J, Malchau H, Wesslen B.
Evaluation of Boneloc. Chemical and mechanical properties, and a randomized clinical study of 30 total hip arthroplasties.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 1995 Jun;66(3):207-14

16) Nilsson KG, Karrholm J, Linder L.
Femoral component migration in total knee arthroplasty: randomized studycomparing cemented and uncemented fixation of the Miller-Galante I design.
>>Go to Abstract
J Orthop Res 1995 May;13(3):347-56

17) Karrholm J, Frech W, Nilsson KG, Snorrason F.
Increased metal release from cemented femoral components made of titanium alloy. 19 hip prostheses followed with radiostereometry (RSA).
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 1994 Dec;65(6):599-604

18) Karrholm J, Borssen B, Lowenhielm G, Snorrason F.
Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses.
>>Go to Abstract
J Bone Joint Surg Br 1994 Nov;76(6):912-7

19) Snorrason F, Karrholm J, Holmgren C.
Fixation of cemented acetabular prostheses. The influence of preoperative diagnosis.
>>Go to Abstract
J Arthroplasty 1993 Feb;8(1):83-90

20) Snorrason F, Karrholm.
Early loosening of revision hip arthroplasty. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.
>>Go to Abstract
J Arthroplasty 1990 Sep;5(3):217-29

21) Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P.
Outcome of total hip replacement: a comparison of different measurement methods.
>>Go to Abstract
Clin Orthop 2001 Sep;(390):163-72

22) Soderman P, Malchau H, Herberts P, Zugner R, Regner H, Garellick G.
Outcome after total hip arthroplasty: Part II. Disease-specific follow-up and the Swedish National Total Hip Arthroplasty Register.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 2001 Apr;72(2):113-9

23) Soderman P, Malchau H.
Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement?
>>Go to Abstract
Clin Orthop 2001 Mar;(384):189-97

24) Herberts P, Malchau H.
Many years of registration have improved the quality of hip arthroplasty.
>>Go to Abstract
Lakartidningen 1999 May 19;96(20):2469-73, 2475-6

25) Persson U, Persson M, Malchau H.
The economics of preventing revisions in total hip replacement.
>>Go to Abstract
Acta Orthop Scand 1999 Apr;70(2):163-9

26) Herberts P, Malchau H.
How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden.
>>Go to Abstract
Clin Orthop 1997 Nov;(344):44-60

27) Malchau H.
Revision total hip arthroplasty. Failure mechanisms and outcomes.
>>Go to Abstract
Orthopedics 1996 Sep;19(9):769-70